Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Computer-Generated vs. Conventional Surgical Guides


A clinical study recently published in the International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants was aimed to compare the accuracy of reproducing planned implant positions with computer-generated and conventional surgical guides using a split-mouth design. The study has shown that CAD/CAM guides had less variability and provided greater accuracy in placing implants than conventional guides.

Click here to read the full article abstract.


Call iMagDent at (866) 977-CBCT today to learn how
computer-generated surgical guides can revolutionize your practice.

2 comments:

  1. Very happy with my treatment results and more importantly, my patient was too. It reduced the potential risk without a doubt.

    Dr. Ramos

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dr. Ramos, thank you for your comment. We agree - surgical guides reduce chair time and eliminate surgical surprises while improving patient outcomes at the same time. It's a win-win!

    ReplyDelete

Please share your comments below.